REMINDER: Please read the "NO TROLLING" sticky

Discuss engine swap details here!

Moderators: notoptoy, S Allen, Solex68

Post Reply
User avatar
Alvin
Roadster Nut-Site Supporter
Posts: 8289
Joined: Tue Jan 23, 2007 7:01 pm

REMINDER: Please read the "NO TROLLING" sticky

Post by Alvin »

It's 2021, and I'm disheartened to be writing this.

FOURTEEN years ago Steve Allen created the following sticky entitled NO TROLLING. See it here:

viewtopic.php?f=15&t=6176

Why was this sticky made? There were members incessantly badgering folks who started engine swap threads, in the engine swap section!
Repeatedly, over and over. You know how it goes. Someone posts that they are going to do and engine swap, looking for technical help...instead they are hit with a barrage of replies with quite the opposite. And here we are, more than a decade later. The NO TROLLING sticky is still there, to prevent thread jacking.

We need an amendment to this sticky. Or even a reminder. Something. So people can get the information they need here and move on without their threads turning into a mess.

Suggestions:
-If you feel strongly about voicing your opinion about Engine Swaps, their "legality", their "worth", their "necessity" etc...Start Your Own Thread!
Don't muck up some poor soul's engine swap thread.

-Alternatively, be bold enough to private message them how you feel
-Unless it's solicited by the OP, keep it to yourself
-If you absolutely must interject because you feel like your reply has critical information that the community can benefit from, ask the OP first! Better yet, request a sticky from the moderators. No need to mention it repeatedly in other's engine swap threads.


This is the ENGINE SWAP SECTION. Let's keep it productive and useful.
This is my SR20 engine swap. I'm proud of it. I've enjoyed it daily for the past 18 years.
Image
Image

viewtopic.php?f=15&t=15837
ps...moderators I'm totally ok if you delete this.
Alvin Gogineni
San Jose, CA
1967.5 SPL/SR20
1997 Acura Integra GS-R
2022 Chevy Bolt EUV
zcarblog.com
Instagram
YouTube
My SR20 Build Thread
devo
Roadsteraholic
Posts: 536
Joined: Mon Jun 17, 2013 7:58 pm
Location: Texas
Model: 1500/1600
Year: Low Windshield-64-67.5

Re: REMINDER: Please read the "NO TROLLING" sticky

Post by devo »

Great reminder and suggestions Alvin!
User avatar
damarble
Roadster Fanatic
Posts: 177
Joined: Fri Oct 26, 2018 8:13 am
Location: Spokane
Model: 1500/1600
Year: High Windshield-68-70

Re: REMINDER: Please read the "NO TROLLING" sticky

Post by damarble »

I wonder what build this is in reference too...

Sorry for getting the hornets stirred up. I end up swapping the engine on most of my stuff in the pursuit of better mileage, or power, or reliability, etc. I have here a 52 Willys with a 95 Ford 3.8 V6, a 04 F150 with a 89 Isuzu 3.9 L4 diesel, a 01 Sport Trac with a 97 Explorer 302. It was inevitable, and inevitable that people won't like it, just as there are people that don't like my other conversions. I do my swaps for me, and I share them for those that may be interested.
Daryl Smith
Roadster Fanatic-Site Supporter
Posts: 1623
Joined: Wed Sep 08, 2004 1:53 pm
Location: Not Here
Model: 1500/1600
Year: Low Windshield-64-67.5

Re: REMINDER: Please read the "NO TROLLING" sticky

Post by Daryl Smith »

Well, I thought I was rather respectful with my post.... :roll: ...perhaps not....trolling? really? me?
I'll just go back and delete those nasty notes.

AS you said...Please be bold enough to message me and let me know if I'm mucking up your thread. I have no problem removing them. I wouldn't normally read a "no trolling" thread.....

Cheers
User avatar
damarble
Roadster Fanatic
Posts: 177
Joined: Fri Oct 26, 2018 8:13 am
Location: Spokane
Model: 1500/1600
Year: High Windshield-68-70

Re: REMINDER: Please read the "NO TROLLING" sticky

Post by damarble »

Daryl Smith wrote: Wed Jan 20, 2021 10:51 pm Well, I thought I was rather respectful with my post.... :roll: ...perhaps not....trolling? really? me?
I'll just go back and delete those nasty notes.

AS you said...Please be bold enough to message me and let me know if I'm mucking up your thread. I have no problem removing them. I wouldn't normally read a "no trolling" thread.....

Cheers
It didn't bother me.
greydog
Roadster Fanatic-Site Supporter
Posts: 1790
Joined: Sat Nov 21, 2009 11:37 pm
Location: Vancouver, Washington
Model: 1500/1600
Year: High Windshield-68-70

Re: REMINDER: Please read the "NO TROLLING" sticky

Post by greydog »

Thanks for the reminder Alvin. These policies and their respectful enforcement are what separated this website from most other forums.
Dan
SPL311 aka Skooter. Sold. Now wasting away in the SF area.
1990 Nissan 300zx. Sold this one too.
2018 VW Tiguan
C.Costine
Roadster Nut-Site Supporter
Posts: 1736
Joined: Fri Feb 13, 2015 8:08 pm

Re: REMINDER: Please read the "NO TROLLING" sticky

Post by C.Costine »

damarble wrote: Wed Jan 20, 2021 10:55 pm
Daryl Smith wrote: Wed Jan 20, 2021 10:51 pm Well, I thought I was rather respectful with my post.... :roll: ...perhaps not....trolling? really? me?
I'll just go back and delete those nasty notes.

AS you said...Please be bold enough to message me and let me know if I'm mucking up your thread. I have no problem removing them. I wouldn't normally read a "no trolling" thread.....

Cheers
It didn't bother me.
Blame it on the tension caused by the C-19, :shock:
located in Chester NH
1967 1600 in restoration
2013 Arctic Cat F-1100 turbo
Ford F-350 6.0
Ford 9000 puller, Ford 960 puller, Ford 901show, Ford 971 worker, Oliver 70 waiting its turn
User avatar
Gregs672000
Roadster Fanatic-Site Supporter
Posts: 9002
Joined: Fri Aug 07, 2009 11:47 pm
Location: Tacoma, WA

Re: REMINDER: Please read the "NO TROLLING" sticky

Post by Gregs672000 »

Let us always strive to be respectful to ALL Roadster owners while remembering that it's a car, it's YOURS, and you can do what ever you want to it to express yourself, from creating a dead stock example to a wild custom. Drive on!
Greg Burrows
'67 2000 #588
Tacoma, WA
User avatar
Alvin
Roadster Nut-Site Supporter
Posts: 8289
Joined: Tue Jan 23, 2007 7:01 pm

Re: REMINDER: Please read the "NO TROLLING" sticky

Post by Alvin »

Daryl Smith wrote: Wed Jan 20, 2021 10:51 pm Well, I thought I was rather respectful with my post.... :roll: ...perhaps not....trolling? really? me?
I'll just go back and delete those nasty notes.

AS you said...Please be bold enough to message me and let me know if I'm mucking up your thread. I have no problem removing them. I wouldn't normally read a "no trolling" thread.....

Cheers
No problems here...in fact I have no idea what you are talking about :D
What did you post?
Alvin Gogineni
San Jose, CA
1967.5 SPL/SR20
1997 Acura Integra GS-R
2022 Chevy Bolt EUV
zcarblog.com
Instagram
YouTube
My SR20 Build Thread
User avatar
redroadster
Roadsteraholic
Posts: 2412
Joined: Tue Mar 12, 2013 10:58 am
Location: KCMO
Model: 1500/1600
Year: High Windshield-68-70

Re: REMINDER: Please read the "NO TROLLING" sticky

Post by redroadster »


Here watch this it is way longer than needed to spit out emmisions regs
Some how stating facts is trolling ?
Trolling is being mean ...you were so ugly when you were born the Dr. Slapped yo mama.
I was not talking to Greg or Alvin
Datsun dealer tech 76 to 87
Mitsubishi tech 9 yrs
Volvo, Kia, Toyota too
6 month - Rolls Royce
ASE MASTER TECH 96. - 11
70 SPL 86 Z31 T , Sportster
User avatar
garth
Roadster Enthusiast
Posts: 919
Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 1:00 am
Location: Delta, BC
Model: 2000
Year: High Windshield-68-70
Contact:

Re: REMINDER: Please read the "NO TROLLING" sticky

Post by garth »

redroadster wrote: Thu Jan 21, 2021 9:04 pm
Here watch this it is way longer than needed to spit out emmisions regs
Some how stating facts is trolling ?
Trolling is being mean ...you were so ugly when you were born the Dr. Slapped yo mama.
I was not talking to Greg or Alvin
Alvin makes some very basic points about trolling posts and how counter-productive they are to an individual's posting about their experience, their problem or their passion as it relates to roadsters. It expands the definition of trolling to include incessant, repetitive, single theme posts replying to a post or topic. Whether the trolling post is factual or not, is inconsequential, it is still trolling and will be treated as such. This definition is commonly used on other progressive forums but not all. 311s.org strives to be like no other forum! Enjoy your roadster today! :D
Garth
_________
68' 2000
Post Reply