Porting a U20 is Such a Waste of Time

Tech tips and how to's

Moderators: notoptoy, S Allen, Solex68

User avatar
tjp
Site Supporter
Posts: 2562
Joined: Wed Aug 20, 2008 5:49 am
Location: Belleville, WI

Re: Porting a U20 is Such a Waste of Time

Post by tjp »

richard wrote: Sun Apr 30, 2023 2:05 am Yes great job thanks guys, interesting article.
Now on the last page last section Lou mentioned about real dyno figures in the next roadster magazine #104 2014.
Does somebody have that also in their archives?

Thanks again,
Richard
Hopefully this is legible.
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.
My junk pile:
71 Jeep Gladiator. Restored w/#s matching engine. My WeeBeasty
70 1600 legit 2nd owner. Stroked and bored
Several salvaged w access to a barn full of parts, part cars & whole cars
......What's in the barn is for sale. What do you need?
User avatar
redroadster
Roadsteraholic
Posts: 2408
Joined: Tue Mar 12, 2013 10:58 am
Location: KCMO
Model: 1500/1600
Year: High Windshield-68-70

Re: Porting a U20 is Such a Waste of Time

Post by redroadster »

What's port velocity got to do with ? One that's not econo small
especially in a very short straight intake. See my GM 3.1 tuna can cyl head post
A 4v Beats a 2 v except for the fact that F I they're running on a much leaner mixture I'd like to build a secondary carb set up for my 4v 4G63 , to see the perf up grade
Datsun dealer tech 76 to 87
Mitsubishi tech 9 yrs
Volvo, Kia, Toyota too
6 month - Rolls Royce
ASE MASTER TECH 96. - 11
70 SPL 86 Z31 T , Sportster
Post Reply