Viability of the Ford 2.3 Ecoboost

Discuss engine swap details here!

Moderators: notoptoy, S Allen, Solex68

User avatar
redroadster
Roadsteraholic
Posts: 2412
Joined: Tue Mar 12, 2013 10:58 am
Location: KCMO
Model: 1500/1600
Year: High Windshield-68-70

Re: Viability of the Ford 2.3 Ecoboost

Post by redroadster »

Actually it's FBI ...they had ten personnel that cover fed emmisions violations vehicles, plants etc. ....your lucky
Datsun dealer tech 76 to 87
Mitsubishi tech 9 yrs
Volvo, Kia, Toyota too
6 month - Rolls Royce
ASE MASTER TECH 96. - 11
70 SPL 86 Z31 T , Sportster
Daryl Smith
Roadster Fanatic-Site Supporter
Posts: 1623
Joined: Wed Sep 08, 2004 1:53 pm
Location: Not Here
Model: 1500/1600
Year: Low Windshield-64-67.5

Re: Viability of the Ford 2.3 Ecoboost

Post by Daryl Smith »

Good luck with the project. Will watch from the sidelines...
User avatar
Slackline
Roadster Fanatic
Posts: 258
Joined: Mon Sep 14, 2020 10:16 am
Location: Clovis, CA
Model: 1500/1600
Year: Low Windshield-64-67.5

Re: Viability of the Ford 2.3 Ecoboost

Post by Slackline »

That is quite a bit of cutting. But sometimes you gotta do what you gotta do to make things fit the way you want. The bolt in cross member is intriguing. I have seen others talk about it but haven't seen one yet. I am not going to do that to mine, but I do have to cut a tunnel through on the passenger side for my exhaust. (Honda)
Keep it up.
Rob

66 Datsun 1600 / K24
2021 CT4-V Blackwing
User avatar
damarble
Roadster Fanatic
Posts: 177
Joined: Fri Oct 26, 2018 8:13 am
Location: Spokane
Model: 1500/1600
Year: High Windshield-68-70

Re: Viability of the Ford 2.3 Ecoboost

Post by damarble »

Slackline wrote: Fri Jan 29, 2021 1:13 am That is quite a bit of cutting. But sometimes you gotta do what you gotta do to make things fit the way you want. The bolt in cross member is intriguing. I have seen others talk about it but haven't seen one yet. I am not going to do that to mine, but I do have to cut a tunnel through on the passenger side for my exhaust. (Honda)
Keep it up.

Yeah too much cutting for most people. Wait til you see the trans tunnel.... I ended up slicing an inch out of the passenger floor board and pushing it over. The NC 6 speed is significantly bigger than NB it seems.
User avatar
Slackline
Roadster Fanatic
Posts: 258
Joined: Mon Sep 14, 2020 10:16 am
Location: Clovis, CA
Model: 1500/1600
Year: Low Windshield-64-67.5

Re: Viability of the Ford 2.3 Ecoboost

Post by Slackline »

Apparently so. I have the older 6 speed and it fits in the tunnel width wise, but I removed a large portion of the PPF mount that stuck out on that side.
Rob

66 Datsun 1600 / K24
2021 CT4-V Blackwing
User avatar
damarble
Roadster Fanatic
Posts: 177
Joined: Fri Oct 26, 2018 8:13 am
Location: Spokane
Model: 1500/1600
Year: High Windshield-68-70

Re: Viability of the Ford 2.3 Ecoboost

Post by damarble »

Slackline wrote: Fri Jan 29, 2021 9:09 pm Apparently so. I have the older 6 speed and it fits in the tunnel width wise, but I removed a large portion of the PPF mount that stuck out on that side.
The bellhousing ribbing and reverse gear bulge were never going to fit. Otherwise the rest of it fit OK, even the intact PPF mounts.
70MTRoadster
Roadster Fanatic
Posts: 148
Joined: Fri Jul 01, 2011 10:36 am
Location: Bozeman, Montana
Model: 2000
Year: High Windshield-68-70

Re: Viability of the Ford 2.3 Ecoboost

Post by 70MTRoadster »

In following along, looks like you placed the order for the engine late Dec 2020. You said 3 month wait.....has it showed up yet as of April 11th? Just hoping for an update....
1968 510 Wagon
1970 Roadster 1600/U20/5 sp. swap
1972 510 4 dr. vg30e/5 sp. ricky racer
1971 510 shell behind the shop, r.i.p.

I drive a Roadster or 510 almost every day!
Post Reply