Roadsters Recognized again - Value rising
Moderators: notoptoy, S Allen, Solex68
- notoptoy
- Vendor-Site Supporter
- Posts: 9700
- Joined: Fri Oct 02, 2009 2:55 pm
- Location: Winston-Salem, NC and Ocala, FL
- Contact:
Roadsters Recognized again - Value rising
I am a little surprised someone else hadn't posted this yet. In today's e-blast from Hagerty there is a nice little article on Japanese Car values and cars to watch.
The 67.5 Roadster came in nicely at number 4 of the 5 listed. And they got the facts right the first time too!
http://www.hagerty.com/Classic-car-arti ... 05-15-2013" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
The 67.5 Roadster came in nicely at number 4 of the 5 listed. And they got the facts right the first time too!
http://www.hagerty.com/Classic-car-arti ... 05-15-2013" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
"When all else fails, force prevails!" Ummm, we're gonna need a bigger hammer here.
67.5 SPL311 H20 w/5 speed
65 Impala Convertible
2017 C43 AMG
67.5 SPL311 H20 w/5 speed
65 Impala Convertible
2017 C43 AMG
- Bob
- Site Supporter
- Posts: 204
- Joined: Sun Feb 24, 2013 6:27 pm
Re: Roadsters Recognized again - Value rising
I am not surprised.
The combination of the low profile and the 2000 engine that the 67.5 features is the best of the Datsun roadsters in its original form.
Earlier and later models may have their attributes, but the original 67.5 is pure sports car aesthetically and in performance.
While the appreciation for the 67.5 may be the high water mark, the appreciation for other roadsters is sure to follow, I think.
We should all feel good about the positive recognition, unless, of course, we are hoping to buy on the cheap.
My guess is the cheap is about to become relative.
The combination of the low profile and the 2000 engine that the 67.5 features is the best of the Datsun roadsters in its original form.
Earlier and later models may have their attributes, but the original 67.5 is pure sports car aesthetically and in performance.
While the appreciation for the 67.5 may be the high water mark, the appreciation for other roadsters is sure to follow, I think.
We should all feel good about the positive recognition, unless, of course, we are hoping to buy on the cheap.
My guess is the cheap is about to become relative.
Bob
Orinda, CA
1964 SPL 310 3 Seater (U20 swap++)
2001 Porsche Boxster
Orinda, CA
1964 SPL 310 3 Seater (U20 swap++)
2001 Porsche Boxster
- dbrick
- Roadster Fanatic-Site Supporter
- Posts: 10084
- Joined: Thu Sep 09, 2004 11:05 pm
- Location: Kenilworth, New Jersey
Re: Roadsters Recognized again - Value rising
The new guy catches on fastBob wrote: My guess is the cheap is about to become relative.

Dave Brisco
Take my advice, I'm not using it"
66 2000 The Bobster
64 1500 in pieces for sale
1980 Fiat X1/9
2009 Volvo C-70
08 Expedition EL, STUPID huge but comfy
1962 Thompson Sea Lancer, possible money pit
- SLOroadster
- Roadsteraholic
- Posts: 5360
- Joined: Sun Dec 08, 2002 2:53 am
- Location: Napa Ca
Re: Roadsters Recognized again - Value rising
dbrick wrote:The new guy catches on fastBob wrote: My guess is the cheap is about to become relative.. If you want a cheap roadster, get it soon. I figure 5 years and we are looking at TR6/TR250 range prices and you're not driving it home for less than $10K
Dave, I think we might already be there. A quick look on ebay has the highest price for a TR6 at $38500, the cheapest is $7K. The TR6 is far more common therefor, you will see more for sale. If you look at decent 2l prices, they are falling between $7K and call it $15K. The nice 2Ls start at $15K and go up from there. No they aren't quite bringing $38K, but its not like they haven't in the past however.
I'm seeing a similar trend with the E30 M3. I think I saw a comment that the price on them has gone up 15% in the past year (It might have been higher, it was from Sports car Marketplace. I can't find the quote now though.) ! Like the M3, the roadster is a limited production model, with some pretty significant racing history. This history is starting to become known to more of the public. I don't know that the roadster will become the icon that the M3 is, but you never know. I got lucky with the M3. It was on the market for months, I bought it for well less than what it was worth. I got it appraised and was shocked, a little shy of $29K. Now, I bet I could sell the car for almost original sticker price. (Not bad for a 25 year old car that was expensive to start with.) There were about 15K 2L roadsters built over 2.5 years, there were a little over 14K M3s built between '87 and '91. Interestingly enough, both have been getting a lot of press lately.
Will
Sorry, I find modern engine swaps revolting. Keep your G, R, or U series in your Roadster!
- FairladySPL
- Roadsteraholic
- Posts: 1009
- Joined: Thu Aug 07, 2008 5:57 pm
- Location: Maryland
Re: Roadsters Recognized again - Value rising
Those of us who've been into these cool little cars for decades are probably nodding that the rest of the world is catching on. I know that's how I feel.
Over on a 311 email reflector, the Hagerty valuation was posted and a discussion has included the impact on the market of highly-modified 311s. The premise is that since these cars were inexpensive for such a long period of time, they were expendable in the sense of owners not feeling much reluctance to make projects out of them.
In fact, when I joined this board a few years ago, this matter was an unfortunate early introduction I had with Alvin. We got off to a bad start when I disagreed with his opinion he posted about the collectible nature of the cars.
Although I believe we smoothed that one out, I still feel the 311s may suffer to some extent the same loss that was seen among pre-war Detroit cars, many of which were turned into street rods, custom lead sleds, and so on. It made things difficult in the years that followed when others began looking for original examples of those cars.
More recently, the Datsun 510, especially the 2-Door, was cited in the email reflector discussion as having suffered the same problem.
In the next 5-10 years, if our forecasts about rising values come true, the modified batch of 311s will still appeal to those who are into that part of the old car hobby. But major mods remove those cars from the general interest collector market, and that will inevitably push the values higher among cars that have been held more-or-less stock, original and restored with originality in mind. And the stronger market for such cars in turn may prompt people to hesitate about making a project out of a car that today is the way it came from the factory.
Over on a 311 email reflector, the Hagerty valuation was posted and a discussion has included the impact on the market of highly-modified 311s. The premise is that since these cars were inexpensive for such a long period of time, they were expendable in the sense of owners not feeling much reluctance to make projects out of them.
In fact, when I joined this board a few years ago, this matter was an unfortunate early introduction I had with Alvin. We got off to a bad start when I disagreed with his opinion he posted about the collectible nature of the cars.
Although I believe we smoothed that one out, I still feel the 311s may suffer to some extent the same loss that was seen among pre-war Detroit cars, many of which were turned into street rods, custom lead sleds, and so on. It made things difficult in the years that followed when others began looking for original examples of those cars.
More recently, the Datsun 510, especially the 2-Door, was cited in the email reflector discussion as having suffered the same problem.
In the next 5-10 years, if our forecasts about rising values come true, the modified batch of 311s will still appeal to those who are into that part of the old car hobby. But major mods remove those cars from the general interest collector market, and that will inevitably push the values higher among cars that have been held more-or-less stock, original and restored with originality in mind. And the stronger market for such cars in turn may prompt people to hesitate about making a project out of a car that today is the way it came from the factory.
--Paul / Annapolis
- garth
- Roadster Enthusiast
- Posts: 919
- Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 1:00 am
- Location: Delta, BC
- Model: 2000
- Year: High Windshield-68-70
- Contact:
Re: Roadsters Recognized again - Value rising
Paul,FairladySPL wrote:Those of us who've been into these cool little cars for decades are probably nodding that the rest of the world is catching on. I know that's how I feel.
........... And the stronger market for such cars in turn may prompt people to hesitate about making a project out of a car that today is the way it came from the factory.
Interesting analysis and perspective. I agree with and support your value escalation prediction but what roadster owner wouldn't! Lol. Serious value appreciation might be 5-10 years out and will probably coincide with other economic factors.
Will
Benchmark comparison to the TR6 and (possibly the Austin Healy 3000) is valid as they represented the Roadster's contemporary imported competitors. Our roadsters will rise to similar value levels.
Interestingly that on one of my first drives a TR6 chased me into a parking lot to stop and chat. The driver and passenger were two young ladies taking their father's newly restored mint BRG 1970 for a cruise. They offered to swap vehicles because they liked the Datsun's curves and nicer shade of green way better. I wonder what their father's reaction would have been if they'd returned in a Datsun! I was not tempted in the least.

Garth
_________
68' 2000
_________
68' 2000
-
- Roadster Fanatic
- Posts: 145
- Joined: Wed Dec 28, 2011 11:34 am
- Location: Dallas, TX
- Contact:
Re: Roadsters Recognized again - Value rising
...snip...FairladySPL wrote:Those of us who've been into these cool little cars for decades are probably nodding that the rest of the world is catching on. I know that's how I feel.
You're probably right, but I think a rising tide raises all ships. A lowered, swapped ratrod is never going to be worth what a concours-level restoration is, but (speaking only for myself) I wanted a unique, interesting vehicle that wasn't obnoxiously expensive to make my own. In ten years I may be kicking myself for "ruining" a piece of automotive history...but with any luck I will have had 9+ years of driving enjoyment out of my car.FairladySPL wrote:In the next 5-10 years, if our forecasts about rising values come true, the modified batch of 311s will still appeal to those who are into that part of the old car hobby. But major mods remove those cars from the general interest collector market, and that will inevitably push the values higher among cars that have been held more-or-less stock, original and restored with originality in mind. And the stronger market for such cars in turn may prompt people to hesitate about making a project out of a car that today is the way it came from the factory.
- FairladySPL
- Roadsteraholic
- Posts: 1009
- Joined: Thu Aug 07, 2008 5:57 pm
- Location: Maryland
Re: Roadsters Recognized again - Value rising
But as you point out, value is what it means to the driver/owner of a modified car, and you're exactly right in obtaining that value the way you see fit.ReddTrain wrote: ...I think a rising tide raises all ships.
A lowered, swapped ratrod is never going to be worth what a concours-level restoration is...
Someone on here a while ago dismissed a posting that declared we are only "caretakers" of these cars, and that somehow we are responsible for passing them along to future drivers and owners in a respectful condition.
I think there's a middle ground, and the discussion about "matching numbers" got to it pretty well. It's a lot easier to not feel guilty about swapping and modifying a car whose condition means it's not likely to become a restoration candidate.
When I joined this site I was fascinated by the number and variety of swaps on the road. And modifications to some extent have been part of the 311 scene the 50 years they've been around.
There's room for both, in my opinion, and as the market pushes prices higher, we all stand to benefit from the visibility. Folks on the outside looking in, on the other hand, may have to cough up larger coin to join the fun ...
--Paul / Annapolis
- Alvin
- Roadster Nut-Site Supporter
- Posts: 8381
- Joined: Tue Jan 23, 2007 7:01 pm
Re: Roadsters Recognized again - Value rising
Well said.FairladySPL wrote: There's room for both, in my opinion, and as the market pushes prices higher, we all stand to benefit from the visibility. Folks on the outside looking in, on the other hand, may have to cough up larger coin to join the fun ...
I don't fore/see the difficulty finding original examples of our cars.FairladySPL wrote: Although I believe we smoothed that one out, I still feel the 311s may suffer to some extent the same loss that was seen among pre-war Detroit cars, many of which were turned into street rods, custom lead sleds, and so on. It made things difficult in the years that followed when others began looking for original examples of those cars.
More recently, the Datsun 510, especially the 2-Door, was cited in the email reflector discussion as having suffered the same problem.
When I was tasked with finding Datsuns for the upcoming Marin-Sonoma Concours D' Elegance I had no problem rounding up fine, "original" examples of Datsun Roadsters. In fact, I think the roadster will be the best represented of all Japanese cars in this exhibit.
On the other hand, finding an un-modified Datsun 510 was impossible. Everyone I know with an S30 wouldn't pass as 100% for this show as well.
We have a dedicated following and professional support for preserving/restoring our cars to original spec. I don't see shops specializing in restoring 510s back to stock, it's the opposite. Maybe it's bad comparison using the 510, but with respect to the "hey you keep modifying these cars and no original ones will be left" mentality... I don't see it.
Alvin Gogineni
San Jose, CA
1967.5 SPL/SR20
1997 Acura Integra GS-R
2022 Chevy Bolt EUV
zcarblog.com
Instagram
YouTube
My SR20 Build Thread
San Jose, CA
1967.5 SPL/SR20
1997 Acura Integra GS-R
2022 Chevy Bolt EUV
zcarblog.com
YouTube
My SR20 Build Thread
- Skyman
- Roadster Fanatic-Site Supporter
- Posts: 2397
- Joined: Thu Dec 15, 2005 6:49 pm
- Location: Salt Lake City, Utah
Re: Roadsters Recognized again - Value rising
I do agree with this statement. The low sticker price of these cars almost made them disposable. I've seen plenty of whacky swaps, conversions, and cars just sitting rotting in fields. It seems people would drive them, and when something major, or not even that major happened, they just parked them in a field, barn, or driveway and moved on. I think we should preserve as many original copies as we can.FairladySPL wrote:I still feel the 311s may suffer to some extent the same loss that was seen among pre-war Detroit cars, many of which were turned into street rods, custom lead sleds, and so on. It made things difficult in the years that followed when others began looking for original examples of those cars.
67.5 SRL311-00060
67.5 SPL311-14241
2004 Porsche 911 Turbo
2003 Ford Powerstroke; Piped & Chipped
67.5 SPL311-14241
2004 Porsche 911 Turbo
2003 Ford Powerstroke; Piped & Chipped
- mraitch
- Roadsteraholic
- Posts: 3629
- Joined: Mon Oct 02, 2006 7:03 pm
- Location: Lake Balboa (SFV) - CA
- Model: 1500/1600
- Year: High Windshield-68-70
- Contact:
Re: Roadsters Recognized again - Value rising
Well kept roadsters (regardless of originality) can only rise in value - but strangely slower than the UK variants.
The 1.5 mill 2000GT certainly draws attention to Japanese products, but these were limited production, high quality motor cars.
But as to whether roadsters (of any era) will become COLLECTOR cars - depends upon originality and accuracy (IMHO) and perception.
Desirable - hugely - but they still live in the fog of 'what is that'.
We are still seeing 'barn finds' of pretty trashed roadsters - parts cars only - generally - 'cos it takes a BUNCH of loot to restore these puppies.
Frankly, on a personal note, I hope they stay in the shadow - since I would rather they stay as desirable to those that know, or will find out, and not start appearing at Scottsdale.
FWIW
The 1.5 mill 2000GT certainly draws attention to Japanese products, but these were limited production, high quality motor cars.
But as to whether roadsters (of any era) will become COLLECTOR cars - depends upon originality and accuracy (IMHO) and perception.
Desirable - hugely - but they still live in the fog of 'what is that'.
We are still seeing 'barn finds' of pretty trashed roadsters - parts cars only - generally - 'cos it takes a BUNCH of loot to restore these puppies.
Frankly, on a personal note, I hope they stay in the shadow - since I would rather they stay as desirable to those that know, or will find out, and not start appearing at Scottsdale.
FWIW
Peter Harrison
1970 1600 (Stroker) - TOAD SAN (Eliza)
1970 1600 (Stock) - As Yet Unnamed
Lake Balboa (SFV) , California
1970 1600 (Stroker) - TOAD SAN (Eliza)
1970 1600 (Stock) - As Yet Unnamed
Lake Balboa (SFV) , California
- Bob
- Site Supporter
- Posts: 204
- Joined: Sun Feb 24, 2013 6:27 pm
Re: Roadsters Recognized again - Value rising
Wow.
Not sure about what I am reading.
Does anyone reading this beside me think we may be holding back the value of the Datsun Roadster.
I submit this.
If we, who are supposed to be true Datsun Roadster aficionados, and I believe we are, can not appreciate the true value of the Datsun Roadster, who can?
At some point, and I think we are there, we have to speak up, and claim the Datsun Roadster as a true collectible.
After all, it is a great and timeless sports car, with an excellent race heritage, and a relative few are left in excellent condition.
Sounds collectible to me.
This may be a case of the true believers questioning their belief.
Hope not.
Not sure about what I am reading.
Does anyone reading this beside me think we may be holding back the value of the Datsun Roadster.
I submit this.
If we, who are supposed to be true Datsun Roadster aficionados, and I believe we are, can not appreciate the true value of the Datsun Roadster, who can?
At some point, and I think we are there, we have to speak up, and claim the Datsun Roadster as a true collectible.
After all, it is a great and timeless sports car, with an excellent race heritage, and a relative few are left in excellent condition.
Sounds collectible to me.
This may be a case of the true believers questioning their belief.
Hope not.
Bob
Orinda, CA
1964 SPL 310 3 Seater (U20 swap++)
2001 Porsche Boxster
Orinda, CA
1964 SPL 310 3 Seater (U20 swap++)
2001 Porsche Boxster
- datsun1500
- Roadsteraholic
- Posts: 1342
- Joined: Wed Sep 19, 2007 8:24 pm
Re: Roadsters Recognized again - Value rising
Skyman wrote: I do agree with this statement. The low sticker price of these cars almost made them disposable
You do realize it was the same as buying a $18,000 car today right? I don't know if an $18,000 toy is considered disposable.
I remember when no one wanted the 1500s......
- Skyman
- Roadster Fanatic-Site Supporter
- Posts: 2397
- Joined: Thu Dec 15, 2005 6:49 pm
- Location: Salt Lake City, Utah
Re: Roadsters Recognized again - Value rising
The median income for men in 1965 was $28,599. In 2005 the median income was $41,386. Not that big of change given the time span. I think the roadsters in 1967 were going new from the dealer for around $2K.datsun1500 wrote:Skyman wrote: I do agree with this statement. The low sticker price of these cars almost made them disposable
You do realize it was the same as buying a $18,000 car today right? I don't know if an $18,000 toy is considered disposable.
67.5 SRL311-00060
67.5 SPL311-14241
2004 Porsche 911 Turbo
2003 Ford Powerstroke; Piped & Chipped
67.5 SPL311-14241
2004 Porsche 911 Turbo
2003 Ford Powerstroke; Piped & Chipped
-
- Roadster Newby
- Posts: 12
- Joined: Sat Jul 03, 2004 9:39 am
- Location: Whitakers, NC
Re: Roadsters Recognized again - Value rising
The $28k median figure is adjusted for inflation. It was actually about $6-7k unadjusted in '65.Skyman wrote:The median income for men in 1965 was $28,599. In 2005 the median income was $41,386. Not that big of change given the time span. I think the roadsters in 1967 were going new from the dealer for around $2K.datsun1500 wrote:Skyman wrote: I do agree with this statement. The low sticker price of these cars almost made them disposable
You do realize it was the same as buying a $18,000 car today right? I don't know if an $18,000 toy is considered disposable.